Banking and PSU Fund
146 Funds Available
Banking and PSU funds are open-ended debt schemes that invest a minimum of 80% of their corpus in debt instruments of banks, Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs), Public Financial Institutions (PFIs), and Municipal Bonds, as mandated by SEBI. Because these issuers enjoy implicit or explicit government backing, their bonds carry near-sovereign credit quality at yields above pure government securities. For investors seeking higher yield than gilt funds with minimal credit risk, banking and PSU funds on PL Capital offer a professionally managed, high-quality quasi-sovereign fixed-income solution.
Overview of Banking and PSU Funds
Banking and PSU funds concentrate their portfolios in the bonds of India’s highest-quality institutional borrowers. Banks in India (particularly public sector banks like SBI, Bank of Baroda, and Canara Bank) and PSUs (NTPC, Power Grid, Indian Oil, NHAI, and others) are either government-owned or government-regulated entities, carrying implicit sovereign backing that makes default highly unlikely. This quasi-sovereign credit quality positions their bonds between pure G-secs (zero credit risk) and pure corporate bonds (variable credit risk).
The yield premium earned by banking and PSU bonds above equivalent-maturity G-secs — typically 30–80 basis points — reflects the minimal incremental credit risk and the lower liquidity of these bonds versus G-secs. Despite this liquidity discount, banking and PSU bonds are significantly more liquid than private corporate bonds, making banking and PSU funds more resilient during market stress than credit risk or even some corporate bond funds.
Banking and PSU funds are popular among conservative fixed-income investors who want more yield than gilt funds without accepting meaningful private corporate credit risk. The category is particularly favoured during periods of corporate credit stress, when investors seek the safety of quasi-sovereign issuers while still earning a spread above G-secs.
Risks Involved in Banking and PSU Funds
Banking and PSU funds carry a low risk profile, with interest rate risk being the primary concern rather than credit risk.
Credit risk in banking and PSU funds is very low: the issuers are government-owned or regulated entities with strong institutional support and a near-zero historical default rate. However, credit risk is not entirely absent — private banks and some PSUs carry their own financial risks, and credit quality can theoretically deteriorate. Regulatory changes, government disinvestment decisions, or unusual financial events can affect specific issuers.
Interest rate risk depends on the fund’s portfolio duration. Banking and PSU funds with longer durations carry meaningful rate sensitivity — a 100 bps rate rise causes NAV declines commensurate with the duration. Liquidity risk is low for banking and PSU bonds in normal markets but may widen during severe stress periods. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks.
Factors To Consider Before Investing in Banking and PSU Funds
For banking and PSU funds, the primary selection factors are duration, expense ratio, and the specific mix of banking versus PSU bonds in the portfolio.
Duration varies significantly across banking and PSU fund schemes. Short-duration banking and PSU funds (1–3 year Macaulay) are more conservative; longer-duration variants (3–5 years) offer higher yield and rate cycle sensitivity. Match the fund’s duration to your investment horizon and interest rate risk tolerance.
The banking versus PSU mix matters: bank bonds (especially public sector bank bonds and AT1 bonds from large PSBs) may carry slightly different risk characteristics than AAA-rated PSU bonds. Review the top issuers in the portfolio to understand the credit composition. TER comparison is the final step — since all banking and PSU funds invest in a similar quasi-sovereign universe, lower TER directly translates to higher net returns.
List of Top Banking and PSU Funds
The table below outlines key characteristics of banking and PSU funds to help you compare and make informed investment decisions.
| Feature | Banking and PSU Funds |
|---|---|
| SEBI Mandate | Min 80% in bonds of banks, PSUs, PFIs, Municipal Bonds |
| Credit Quality | Quasi-sovereign (AAA to AA+, government-backed) |
| Risk Level | Low to Moderate |
| Yield Premium over Gilt | ~30–80 bps |
| Ideal Investment Horizon | 1–3 years |
| Best Use Case | Conservative corporate yield pickup, safe FD alternative |
How Do Banking and PSU Funds Work?
Banking and PSU funds deploy capital into a concentrated portfolio of bonds from government banks and PSU entities. The fund manager selects instruments based on issuer credit quality, maturity profile, and yield optimisation within the quasi-sovereign universe.
The portfolio earns a spread above G-secs (the credit spread) plus the base G-sec yield, delivering a total return higher than equivalent-duration gilt funds at minimal additional credit risk. As bonds mature, proceeds are reinvested in fresh banking and PSU instruments at prevailing market rates.
Duration management within the fund’s portfolio varies by scheme mandate — some banking and PSU funds are short-duration (1–3 years), while others maintain a medium duration (2–4 years). In a falling rate environment, longer-duration banking and PSU funds generate capital appreciation in addition to accrual, similar to gilt funds.
Redemptions are typically T+1 or T+2. Most banking and PSU funds have no exit load or a minimal early exit charge. Daily NAV and portfolio details are available on the PL Capital platform.
Advantages of Banking and PSU Funds
Banking and PSU funds offer an excellent risk-adjusted return profile: the quasi-sovereign credit quality (near-zero default risk) combined with a 30–80 bps yield premium over pure G-secs makes them one of the most efficient risk-return trades in the investment-grade debt fund universe.
For risk-averse investors who find the credit risk of corporate bond funds uncomfortable but want more yield than gilt funds, banking and PSU funds occupy the ideal middle ground. The government backing of issuers provides strong credit quality assurance; the credit spread above G-secs delivers incremental return without material incremental risk.
The category is particularly resilient during equity market stress and corporate credit crises — when investors flee to quality, quasi-sovereign banking and PSU bonds hold their value well. Professional fund management ensures portfolio quality is maintained, and PL Capital’s platform provides complete portfolio transparency.
How to Invest in Banking and PSU Funds?
Step 1: Download the PL Capital app or visit plindia.com.
Step 2: Open a free account and complete KYC.
Step 3: Navigate to Banking and PSU Funds. Compare duration, YTM, TER, and portfolio banking-vs-PSU mix.
Step 4: Match the fund’s Macaulay duration to your investment horizon.
Step 5: Select a Direct Plan for the lowest TER.
Step 6: Invest via lump sum for a specific goal or via SIP for systematic allocation.
Step 7: Monitor daily NAV on PL Capital.
Step 8: Redeem at your target date, typically with no exit load from banking and PSU funds.
Why Should You Invest in Banking and PSU Funds?
- Quasi-sovereign credit safety: Near-zero default risk from government-backed banks and PSU borrowers.
- Yield premium over gilts: Earn 30–80 bps more than equivalent-duration G-secs at minimal additional credit risk.
- Flight-to-quality resilience: Banking and PSU bonds hold their value during corporate credit stress and equity market turmoil.
- Conservative FD alternative: Well-suited for conservative investors seeking better yields than FDs without meaningful corporate credit risk.
- Liquidity advantage over private corporate bonds: PSU bonds are more liquid than many private corporate instruments, aiding portfolio management.
- Simple, transparent portfolio: Concentrated in well-known, publicly monitored institutional issuers — easy to understand and follow.
Taxation Rules of Banking and PSU Funds
Banking and PSU funds are non-equity funds. Under the Finance Act 2023, all capital gains are treated as STCG at the investor’s income tax slab rate, regardless of holding period. The LTCG with indexation benefit has been removed for post-April 2023 investments. Dividend income is taxed at slab rates.
Conclusion
Banking and PSU funds are one of the most rational risk-reward propositions in the debt fund space — delivering meaningful yield above gilt funds with a credit quality profile that most conservative investors find highly acceptable.
Explore PL Capital’s banking and PSU fund range on plindia.com.
FAQs on Banking and PSU Funds
What are Banking and PSU Funds?
Banking and PSU funds are SEBI-defined open-ended debt schemes mandated to invest at least 80% of their corpus in debt instruments of banks, PSUs, PFIs, and Municipal Bodies. Because these issuers are government-owned or regulated, their bonds carry near-sovereign credit quality (typically AAA or AA+) at yields slightly above pure government securities. They are suitable for conservative investors seeking safe, quasi-sovereign corporate yield above gilt fund returns.
What is the credit quality of Banking and PSU Funds?
Banking and PSU funds maintain the highest credit quality in the corporate bond universe — typically concentrated in AAA and AA+ rated bonds from government banks (SBI, Bank of Baroda, Canara Bank) and PSUs (NTPC, Power Grid, NHAI, Indian Oil). The government ownership or regulation of these entities provides implicit sovereign support, making default risk near-negligible. Most banking and PSU bonds are rated AAA by CRISIL, ICRA, or CARE.
How do Banking and PSU Funds differ from Gilt Funds?
Gilt funds invest exclusively in government securities — the highest credit quality available (sovereign guarantee) but at the base G-sec yield. Banking and PSU funds invest in bonds of government-backed institutions, earning a credit spread of 30–80 bps above gilt yields at slightly higher credit risk. Banking and PSU funds are better for investors who want quasi-sovereign safety with a modest yield pickup; gilt funds are better for pure rate cycle plays with zero credit risk.
What risks are involved in Banking and PSU Funds?
Interest rate risk is the primary concern — the portfolio duration determines NAV sensitivity to rate movements. Credit risk is very low but not zero: PSU and bank bonds carry near-sovereign quality, though regulatory changes or specific institutional stress can affect individual issuers. Liquidity risk is low in normal markets. Overall, banking and PSU funds are among the lowest-risk corporate debt fund categories. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks.
How are Banking and PSU Funds taxed?
Under the Finance Act 2023, all capital gains from banking and PSU funds are treated as STCG and taxed at the investor’s applicable income tax slab rate, regardless of holding period. The LTCG with indexation benefit has been removed for post-April 2023 investments. Dividend income is taxed at slab rates. Conservative investors in lower tax brackets find banking and PSU fund returns competitive with bank FDs on a post-tax basis.
Can I invest in Banking and PSU Funds through a SIP?
Yes, SIPs are available in banking and PSU funds. A monthly SIP is an effective way to build a conservative fixed-income corpus systematically over 1–3 years, averaging entry across different interest rate levels. Banking and PSU fund SIPs work particularly well for investors who want a reliable, low-risk debt holding as the fixed-income component of a balanced portfolio alongside equity SIPs.
How do Banking and PSU Funds compare to Corporate Bond Funds?
Banking and PSU funds invest in quasi-sovereign issuers (government banks and PSUs) with near-zero credit risk. Corporate bond funds invest in the broader AA+ and above-rated corporate universe, including private sector companies, earning an additional 20–50 bps credit spread above banking and PSU bonds but with slightly higher corporate credit risk. Banking and PSU funds are safer and more conservative; corporate bond funds offer more yield at marginally higher credit risk.
